Discussion about this post

User's avatar
drdinkthecat's avatar

Truth be told: he was a pretty marginal football coach too.

https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/coaches/tommy-tuberville-1.html

At best, a legend in his own mind.

Patrick Neary's avatar

In answer to your subject line question, Tommy has asked for a Senate vote on the DOD policy in question. Note he didn't ask for it to be passed; he just asked that all 100 US Senators state whether they agree or disagree with the policy.

He has said he believes the policy promotes abortion. I disagree. It remains against the law to use federal funds to pay for an abortion. The DOD policy was a change, in that it added a benefit for service members to be repaid for travel expenses (and given compensatory time off) to travel outside of their assigned state in order to procure an abortion. So there was a cause, even if I don't agree with it.

His hold is consistent with Senatorial policy and prerogatives. But to suggest it is affecting readiness or is pre-coup plotting is a bit much. The hold only applies to senior GO/FOs. All such positions have "acting" designates who can continue to function in the absence of the nominee. And why would these "acting" officials be more likely to support a coup?

This entire episode represents the extemification (if I may coin a term) of today's politics. Tuberville can do it, but he shouldn't. Schumer could hold a simple vote, but he doesn't; I wonder why? People act like DOD is tottering when it isn't. Much better to whip up a frenzy on all sides.

For the record, I am pro-life but I do not support Tuberville's basic point, nor his use of the hold. But it's not TEOTWAWKI, nor is it coup-plotting.

6 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?